cloudy cloudy

Author Topic: 2.2.0 rose  (Read 1927 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jgillett

  • John - W7JKG
  • Posts: 968
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • OS/Browser:
  • Win 7/Srvr 2008R2
  • Safari 5.1.7
    • TiggrWeather Phoenix
2.2.0 rose
« on: February 16, 2013, 04:04:20 PM »
Nice change, Mark. Think this presentation makes a lot more sense than the radar view.

Thanks!
« Last Edit: February 17, 2013, 12:04:24 AM by jgillett »
John
W7JKG


Offline mcrossley

  • Posts: 658
  • Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
    • none
  • OS/Browser:
  • Win 7/Srvr 2008R2
  • Chrome 24.0.1312.57
    • WilmslowAstro Weather
Re: 2.2.0 rose
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2013, 09:30:47 PM »
Thanks John, I had to tweak the RGraph Rose library a little to make it work as I wanted though.
Mark

Offline jgillett

  • John - W7JKG
  • Posts: 968
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • OS/Browser:
  • Mac OS X 10.5
  • Firefox 17.0
    • TiggrWeather Phoenix
Re: 2.2.0 rose
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2013, 12:05:10 AM »
Consider it well-tweaked...   :D
John
W7JKG


Offline gwwilk

  • Posts: 682
  • Lincoln, NE
  • OS/Browser:
  • Win 7/Srvr 2008R2
  • Chrome 24.0.1312.57
    • Southeast Lincoln Weather
Re: 2.2.0 rose
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2013, 02:09:42 PM »
I also like the new Windrose, Mark.  Yet even with Ken's modified files I can't get proper validation, so my old SteelSeries Gauges remain in my flyout menu.  The first error is due to non-UTF8-standard characters in my 'Top' code which when eliminated then allowed 20 or so more errors to show up, starting with AjaxGizmo.  I may work on this some, just use all of my gauges-specific supporting scripts like in my 1.6.5 code which don't support style-switching, or I may just remove the validation links for this page.
Regards, Jerry Wilkins
[email protected]

Offline mcrossley

  • Posts: 658
  • Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
    • none
  • OS/Browser:
  • Win 7/Srvr 2008R2
  • Chrome 24.0.1312.57
    • WilmslowAstro Weather
Re: 2.2.0 rose
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2013, 05:11:52 PM »
Jerry

the 'bad' characters are contained in this bit of code, not sure if that helps? 0x86 is a dagger character in Windows/ISO code page 1252

<div id="outer"><a href="#go_home" title="To Top of Page"><span style="font-size:75%">��<br/>Top</span></a></div>
Mark

Offline gwwilk

  • Posts: 682
  • Lincoln, NE
  • OS/Browser:
  • Win 7/Srvr 2008R2
  • Chrome 24.0.1312.57
    • Southeast Lincoln Weather
Re: 2.2.0 rose
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2013, 05:44:49 PM »
Jerry

the 'bad' characters are contained in this bit of code, not sure if that helps? 0x86 is a dagger character in Windows/ISO code page 1252

<div id="outer"><a href="#go_home" title="To Top of Page"><span style="font-size:75%">��<br/>Top</span></a></div>

Surely so, Mark, as I mentioned in my post.  I reverted to my normal files and posted the link so others could see that 2-2-0 is working.  Eliminate the bad characters and the AjaxGizmo becomes the next problem.  Eliminate that and a host of others appear.  Like I said, I may try to sort it all out sometime, but meanwhile my menu system points to my 1-6-5 version that I made UTF-8 compliant before Ken posted his template code revisions.  Right now I'm a big fan of 'XHTML 1.0 Transitional' and not of 'HTML5'.  Even the w3c validator recognizes that its HTML5 validation is experimental.  After achieving conformance, at least it draws a gold warning rather than a red one, but it's still a warning.  I guess I'm just a 70 y/o curmudgeon when you get down to it. :)
Regards, Jerry Wilkins
[email protected]

Offline mcrossley

  • Posts: 658
  • Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
    • none
  • OS/Browser:
  • Win 7/Srvr 2008R2
  • Chrome 24.0.1312.57
    • WilmslowAstro Weather
Re: 2.2.0 rose
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2013, 06:02:48 PM »
Well, at least as of December 17th last year the HTML 5 'standard' moved to a 'definition complete' status and is now in interoperability testing. So the syntax and functionality specification is now complete, and the world moves on to HTML 5.1  #-o
Mark

Offline jgillett

  • John - W7JKG
  • Posts: 968
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • OS/Browser:
  • Mac OS X 10.5
  • Firefox 17.0
    • TiggrWeather Phoenix
Re: 2.2.0 rose
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2013, 02:29:51 AM »
I guess I'm just a 70 y/o curmudgeon when you get down to it. :)
Ahh - glad to hear I'm not the only one fitting that description here...   :roll:

Very strange about your troubles. Had no problems here with the V3/HTML5 upgrades or 2.2.0. However, did mess it up on the first try which was entirely my bad. Started again, this time leaving out mods I had made. That one came up clean. Then went back slowly adding mods. This ol' fuddy-duddy needs new reading glasses!
John
W7JKG