I agree with TK, if it's radiation you are blocking then styrofoam, esp the foil covered stuff, will be a lot simpler to work with and equally effective. Also that big steel container will have a lot of thermal mass and could even make things worse if it cools below air temp. IMHO the IR filter is overkill too for this simple application. Also jm2c
Well we'll see.

Vacuum insulation has a much higher R-value than styrofoam. The biggest influence on the temp probe should mainly be diabatic processes from the IR absorption/emittance.
Definitely agree about the "too clever" post a bit up, but I'd like to see just how much of a temp differential I can get with this method. I like the desiccant idea to remove as much moisture as possible from the jar. In a perfect scenario I'd think we'd want as little water vapor as possible in the jar so that the black body could rapidly radiationally cool without reaching saturation (I think that was mentioned a bajillion pages ago but I can't remember).
I saw some people used heatsinks for the black body. I have some Krylon ultra flat black paint that has a very high emissivity. I'll probably just spray the probe and a big metal fender washer black with it. The old 3M super black velvet paint I believe had an emissivity near 1.00, but I'm not sure it is possible to find it anywhere anymore.
I got the 1000nm IR filter for the cover so I will lose some of the near infrared wavelengths re-emitted by clouds, but most of the wavelength spectra are above 1000nm anyways. Plus this will really cut down on the radiative flux from the sun making it into the jar during the daytime hours. Overkill? Maybe. But I'm a meteorology grad student and love this stuff so it isn't just a hobby to me. I'm hoping to be able to use this jar enough after sunrise and before sunset to pull off smooth 24hr cloud cover obs combined with my Bird Clear Sky Model solar ones.